Terrence Bolden v. Su-Taxi Cab, Inc.

<p>Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ October 29, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A20A1113. TERRENCE BOLDEN v. SU-TAXI CAB, INC. et al. In this personal injury action, plaintiff Terrence Bolden filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s amended judgment awarding him damages in the amount of $1,436, and the court’s order denying his motion to set aside and for new trial. However, we lack jurisdiction. Appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less require compliance with the discretionary appeal statute. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), (b); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357, 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998). Because the judgment entered was less than $10,000, Bolden was required to file a discretionary application in order to appeal. See Jennings, 235 Ga. App. at 357; see also Hill v. Rose Elec. Co., 220 Ga. App. 603, 604 (469 SE2d 844) (1996). His failure to do so deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/29/2020 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. A20A1113 Court of Appeals of Georgia gactapp Ga. Ct. App. Terrence Bolden v. Su-Taxi Cab, Inc. 30 October 2020 Published c3212b882a6f154783643c8e3c688a0bedf09b3f</p><br>
<a href="/opinion/4801947/terrence-bolden-v-su-taxi-cab-inc/">Original document</a>
Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on Beware.org, it is strongly advised to avoid Terrence Bolden v. Su-Taxi Cab, Inc. in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from Terrence Bolden v. Su-Taxi Cab, Inc.. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike Beware.org, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
Terrence Bolden v. Su-Taxi Cab, Inc. is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.