Diciurcio John Review

William T. Di Ciurcio II,has been disciplined by Supreme Court of New Jersey for false and misleading communication, violating attorney rules and regulations.Even though disciplinary actions have been taken against him, this attorney has not ceased from violating court rules,regulations and he continues with his deceptive practices.According to the instructions served with my Motion,paragraph 7a,opposition to a Motion (filed by you, the “Respondent”) must be served on the “Movant”and the court no less than 8 days before the return date.As the Movant,I received the alleged response to my Motion, by William T. Di Ciurcio,II, via email, only 2 days before the return date. | And my reply had to be filed 4 days before the return date. Paragraph 7b, The “Movant” may reply to your opposition no less than 4 days before the return date.Also this attorney knows or he should know that he cannot officially serve court papers through email. Paragraph 10 states that, the respondent has to send a copy of their opposition papers and all supporting documents to all parties by regular mail and certified mail.Mr. Di Ciurcio’s deceitful actions denied me,the Movant, the opportunity to reply to the defendant’s opposition before the return date.This was a conspiracy to defraud the court. William T. Di Ciurcio,II should not be practicing law.

—–

Name: Diciurcio John

Country: United States

State: New Jersey

City: Cherry Hill

Address: 900 Kings Hwy N #310

Phone: 856-382-7688

Website:

Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on Beware.org, it is strongly advised to avoid Diciurcio John Review in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from Diciurcio John Review. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike Beware.org, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
Diciurcio John Review is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.


>