Damaged Ink Tattoo and Body Piercing Review

This shop should not be trusted, especially the piercer Kyler. He clearly has no proper training and is obviously not certified to be sticking holes in people. I went to this shop to get my other nostril pierced and ended up waiting four hours for this two pierces to get through probably only 10 other piercings before me. Why it took so long, I have no idea but my entire day was wasted. When it was finally my turn, Kyler preped everything but wasn’t properly sanitizing his hands or my nose before he did the work. He drew a huge circle on my nose and asked if that spot looked okay and I assumed he meant the middle of the circle but apparently he meant the top because that’s where the piercing ended up. Then, when he finished, he didn’t give me any after care instructions, | I had to ask him what to do, to which he said “wash it with soap”. I looked at the piercing in my car and noticed how off it was and also realized he did the piercing sideways so that the stud didn’t even lay flat on my nose. [continued below]….

—–

Name: Damaged Ink Tattoo and Body Piercing

Country: United States

State: Arizona

City: Mesa

Address: 2950 S Alma School Rd

Phone: 480-588-6864

Website: www.damagedinktattoo.com/

Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on Beware.org, it is strongly advised to avoid Damaged Ink Tattoo and Body Piercing Review in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from Damaged Ink Tattoo and Body Piercing Review. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike Beware.org, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
Damaged Ink Tattoo and Body Piercing Review is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.


>