Clerk of Courts-Municipal Review

Imagine your neighbor is murdered and you are on trial for the murder as the only suspect. Imagine my having taken videos of the real murderer of your neighbor. How would you feel about my being told “NO evidence allowed” in your case because I’m not a “party to the case”? It’s a different scenario now, isn’t it? I’ll tone it down for you: Imagine your child is in the morgue and you are not only mourning but are arrested for child abuse which you know you are innocent of. It goes to trial and you lose knowing the whole time that I was with evidences that would find you innocent. I’m on a roll, Imagine you are hit in the head and wake up to find you’ve also been robbed and stripped naked but that I have pretty solid evidence to show who the mugger was. How would it feel to you that your attacker is free because my evidence wasn’t admissible (for failure to learn legalese in time to save you from the courts?). | One last one: Imagine YOUR mom is accused of being the “cause” of damages to a property. Imagine if YOU had Videos showing the old lady they found guilty wasn’t the one damaging the crow property. Imagine YOU had rental receipts showing you were an integral part of the lawsuit and the actual tenant at the time of the disasters, imagine you possessed signed documents to and from the Crows (prior to any suit ever having been filed against your mother, in which both parties within the documents acknowledge that you, and not your mom, were the tenant), imagine you had other witnesses that would have altered the outcome and fate of YOUR mom, imagine you being denied to be in a position to produce photos and videos showing what the condition of the crow property was like when you arrived, imagine you had Videos and photos taken of the Crow property during your tenancy, imagine you had videos and photos showing the condition of the crow property when YOU departed 1335 North Limestone Street in Springfield Ohio, imagine being stripped of your first-person testimony, imagine you had more evidence and were not allowed to present it in a court of law, not even to defend your own mother by order of a Judge. | Only a plaintiff, defendant, or judge can compel evidence in these courts. When I attempted to hold up evidence in court, Judge Thomas Trempe waved me down, when I stated that my video evidences were in the court room on that fateful day of December 1, 2016, the judge appeared to be disinterested in regards to evidence. Judge Trempe reprimanded me stating that my mother, who has never in her life ever received any summons for anything, was now left to fend for herself without the “benefit” of counsel, that it is up to HER to compel the evidence. | Early on in the Municipal Court Case against my mother, prior to Pre-Trial, I filed two motions to the court; a “motion to intervene” (naively assuming the english language was understandable to all of us….who knew the courts would change the word “intervene” to mean something else?), and a “motion to correct the record” (I’m not an attorney and so I don’t know the magic words, and my mom on the firing block does not allow enough time to learn the volumes that an attorney studies years to be proficient in, so “Motion to Correct the Record” was the best I could do at the time allotted. Both Motions were denied by Judge Trempe. | I promptly filed an appeal to the second appellate court of appeals but then over 2 months after I filed with the appellate, the lower court Judge went ahead and had Trial anyway. My mother was left without counsel and was clueless as to what to say and do in there. Only my mom’s witnesses were sequestered leaving my mom to go up against the Crow Attorney and Judge alone, the same judge that has Denied our over 17 motions to the Municipal Court Record (with exhibits, including this video and about 4 others, not including other evidences and sworn statements). | We even filed a Counter-Suit by the urging of the municipal court clerk, I was sure the Appellate was a standard above the lower court and took the bait….they took our money and then summarily denied the counter-suit. It’s tough in Springfield Ohio to try to be able to obtain the justice we are told exists…the lower court denied my ability to become a party and disregarded the 5 times in my motion in which i state to be in possession of evidence (stated within my feeble Motion to Correct The Record, which I believe was 2 pages of actual content, so the mention of 5x stating to be in possession of evidence is not easily missed). I stated to the Judge, the opposing counsel, of course to the Crows, everybody was made aware that I have video evidence showing my mom did not cause the damage and here it is 2 years later, having to go to Federal Court to undo the bad unmistakable mis-judgment of the Clark County Municipal Court. | My evidence, if permitted may have refuted any claim made by the Crows. Clark County Municipal Court of Ohio went ahead and ushered the 70++ year old trembling woman into the Court room alone and had trial leaving her to fend for herself. Judge Trempe decided to disregard my appeal submitted to the Second Appellate and had the Trial a few months after pre-trial knowing my mother would be without counsel (since counsel quit after a meeting with the judge and opposing counsel | ******p.s. Note to all Springfield Citizens, if your attorney leaves you in the hall and walks into a back room with the judge and the opposing attorney, be very afraid, and have a backup plan! My mom’s paid attorney emerged to state he’d not be representing my mom anymore (not that he appeared interested in the case …well, maybe at first, when that $1k hit his bank, but as for the numerous calls and emails I sent to him prior to pre-trial (none returned), it was a stone wall with that guy. | The municipal court went ahead and had trial without allowing evidence to be presented. | Five months later, after my innocent mother was told she is the cause for damages and must give the crow’s $4k++ for being the “cause” for damages, five more months later the Appellate returned with a decision to concur. This is a total breakdown of trust, concurred by the Court of Appeals that an interested party (me) that has submitted over 17 motions to the court WITH EVIDENCES and EXHIBITS and has claimed over and over to have more evidences, all denied by the Clark County Municipal Court, and now the appellate concurs five months after the trial stating my mom “did not file an appeal”. We should hope for better on the appeal? Really? Not allowed without the magic words that only a trained attorney would know. The appellate concurred, but do bother to read and understand the entire scope, see , concurred 5 months after the lower court totally shirked the appellate division and went to trial anyway, to keep me without the ability to show any of my evidences, this is not good people. | I’ve already started my paperwork as the Federal Website is very helpful with forms and information, but would appreciate any input that others might avail so this matter can be concluded in my lifetime. | I did receive a letter from a Washington DC firm that states that they’ve made numerous attempts to contact me (I tend not to answer out of state calls). There is one more law firm that is national, but I’ll not know if it pans out until the attorney assigned to my inquiry calls in a few days. | There are may be several suits now (in fact, if the Institution’s attorney decides to take the case (I think he/she is going to, though), then there will be at least two cases, if the washington or another attorney should respond, then I’ll be doing something a bit different and will post the events as they happen. | One thing I’m relatively certain of, there will be at least one Federal matter. | Part of me is very disheartened to see the stark reality of the apparent crumbling system that is in our midst right now. Nobody should have to go through this much trouble just to show evidence to save a loved one (or anyone!) against what seems like a not-to-be-trusted system. | They found my 70++ year old mother guilty of damaging ceiling tiles and carpet. Do you see the old lady doing any such thing in these videos? | | sorry about the rambling….i’m very frustrated and pessimistic right now (thinking about how your mom is next). |


Name: Clerk of Courts-Municipal

Country: United States

State: Ohio

City: Springfield

Address: 50 E Columbia St # 2

Phone: 937-328-3715


Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on, it is strongly advised to avoid Clerk of Courts-Municipal Review in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from Clerk of Courts-Municipal Review. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
Clerk of Courts-Municipal Review is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.